OptiLASIK(TM) Laser Vision Correction*

Are you a prospective LASIK patient?

Alcon

Change text size: A | A | A

Treat more patients, better.

The custom treatment your patients want…
The custom treatment options you need.

No two patients are alike, so why would you treat them the same? Some LASIK systems say they offer “true” custom LASIK, but LASIK can’t be truly custom unless it offers you, the surgeon, the flexible treatment options to treat more patients, how you see fit.

Offering the widest range of wavefront-based LASIK, OptiLASIK Laser Vision Correction – powered by WaveLight® Allegretto Wave® Lasers– provides multiple custom treatment options, so you can choose the unique procedure that’s right for your patients:

> Wavefront Optimized® LASIK was developed to consider the unique curvature of the eye, preserving the natural, aspheric shape of the cornea, for less induced spherical aberration.1

> Wavefront-Guided LASIK is designed to provide personalized treatment, with a reduction of higher order aberrations.2,3

Laser vision correction isn’t one-size-fits-all. When it comes to LASIK, you need options. You need OptiLASIK Vision Correction.

The Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q Laser:

The performance behind the procedure.

Studies show that surgical issues can be reduced with faster, more accurate procedures.4 OptiLASIK Laser Vision Correction is powered by the advanced Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q Laser, specially designed to enhance safety at high speeds:

Together, these innovations allow the Allegretto Wave® Eye-Q Laser to provide improved patient comfort and excellent clinical results, with a low potential for complications or retreatment.2

Where Surgeons Stand:

77% of surgeons want custom LASIK that does more.

22% of surgeons are fine with less from “true” custom LASIK.

Make your choice – text “LESS” or “MORE” to “46957-92397”

References:

  1. Waring GO, Durrie DS. Emerging trends for procedure selection in contemporary refractive surgery: consecutive review of 200 cases from a single center. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S419-S423.
  2. US Food and Drug Administration. Summary of safety and effectiveness data for a supplemental premarket approval application. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf2/P020050S004b.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2009.
  3. Padmanadham P, Mrochen M, Basuthkar S, et al. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis: contralateral comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:389-397.
  4. Alio JL, Hamid IM. Intraoperative complications of LASIK. In: Albert D, Miller J, Azar D, Cocks ACF, Blodi B, eds. Albert & Jakobiec’s Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders W B Co; 2008:1051-1059.
  5. Seiler T, Koller T. Excimer laser instrumentation. In: Albert D, Miller J, Azar D, Cocks ACF, Blodi B, eds. Albert & Jakobiec’s Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders W B Co; 2008:981-985.
  6. Huang D, Arif M. Spot size and quality of scanning laser correction of higher order wavefront aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:407-416.
  7. Chalita MR, Krueger RR. Wavefront-guided excimer laser surgery. In: Albert D, Miller J, Azar D, Cocks ACF, Blodi B, eds. Albert & Jakobiec’s Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders W B Co; 2008:1041-1049.
  8. Mrochen M, Schelling U, Wuellner C, et al. Influence of spatial and temporal spot distribution on the ocular surface quality and maximum ablation depth after photoablation with 1050 Hz excimer laser system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:363-373.